proposed correction in line 6 based on photo published in ed.pr.; cf. Gignac I:305.

 - Proposed correction in line 6, based on photo published in ed.pr. Cf. Gignac I:305.
 - proposed correction in line 6 based on photo published in ed.pr.; cf. Gignac I:305.
 - line 6: ἕως→ ὣς (l. ἕως) based on published photograph (plate 4); epsilon is not present

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - ReturnToSender - In the submission comments box please explain in some detail what has been changed and why.   (Rodney Ast)
 - Vote - ReturnToSender - Please take a look at the following files in papyri.info: papyri.info/ddbdp/sb;22;15336; papyri.info/ddbdp/p.vind.sal;;7; papyri.info/ddbdp/p.oxy;8;112; papyri.info/ddbdp/sb;20;15020. If you click on the Editorial history and look at the submission notes it will indicate to you how we would like to enter these types of correction. (James Cowey)
 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept. This seems reasonable to me. Perhaps better to encode <:<ἕ>ως=PN or <:<:ἕως|reg|ως:>=PN ; lin3-4=> ἄ̣νελ4.- θε ; lin4-5=> <:δέδε̣ρ5.- κέ|subst|δεδα̣ρ5.- κε:> ; lin10=>  ὑ(¨)β[ρισ]θῶ (Joshua D. Sosin)
 - Vote - AcceptText - Ln 6: Yes, there doesn't appear to be an epsilon.  The substitution of ὡς for ἕως is not unheard of in later Greek, see LSJ, ὡς Ad. 2 and Gignac I, 305 (w/ fn. 3).  Perhaps better to keep ὡς in the text and note the regularized reading ἕως. (Rodney Ast)
 - Finalized - Ready (Rodney Ast)