Fix check for bishop pair in material imbalance

Prefer pos.bishop_pair() to pos.count<BISHOP>(WHITE) > 1
because the first checks that the two bishops are on
different color squares.

Although the change seems to kick in only in very rare cases,
quite surprisingly it was able to pass SPRT test at short TC.

LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 39818 W: 8174 L: 7956 D: 23688

bench: 3453941
Rewrite backward pawn detection

Use the new backmost_sq() instead of a loop.

No functional change.
Revert "Fix check for bishop pair in material imbalance"

Idea is sound but implementation is partial. Ryan and Joona noticed that
    we leave an hole in material table. Also we got another report by an user
    of an odd behaviour. Namely, if you start stockfish and from the prompt
    give 'bench' you get 3453941, then if you run again bench you get 3453940.

    The reason is that two different positions with the same number of pieces,
    but one with a bishop pair and another without have the same material key.
    But after Eelco patch also different material imbalance and this yields
    to this issue.

    Restesting at long TC shows the patch does not really contribute at
    ELO improvement. Actually patch failed at long TC.

    LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94)
    Total: 23109 W: 4104 L: 4092 D: 14913

    So revert.

    bench: 3453945
Do not prune useless checks in QS

Passed both SPRT tests in "simplification mode", so with
elo0: -3.00 alpha: 0.05 elo1: 3.00 beta: 0.05

Short TC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 6243 W: 1302 L: 1195 D: 3746

Long TC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 22972 W: 4124 L: 4020 D: 14828

bench: 4633330