Ahh this has been resolved already I've just not updated it. We're gonna have a wiki page with statuses.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Zachary King <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In bylaws/004-psr-workflow.md:
> 
> > +No PSR number is assigned to the proposal at this point.
> > +
> > +The Editor must then locate two voting members to sponsor the proposal, one of whom agrees to be the
> > +Coordinator. The Editor, Sponsors, and existing additional Contributors if any form the working group
> > +for the proposal.
> > +
> > +The proposal is NOT required to be fully developed at this point, although that is permitted. At
> > +minimum, it must include a statement of the problem to be solved and basic information on the
> > +general approach to be taken. Further revision and expansion is expected during the Draft phase.
> > +
> > +The Coordinator must initiate an entrance vote to enquire whether the members of PHP-FIG are generally
> > +interested in publishing a PSR for the proposed subject, even if they disagree with the details of
> > +the proposal. The coordinator must announce the vote on the Mailing List in a thread titled
> > +"[VOTE][Entrance] Title of the proposal". The vote must adhere to [the voting protocol][voting].
> > +
> > +If the vote passes, the proposal officially enters Draft stage. The proposal receives a PSR number
> I think the confusion is from the "auto-incremented from the last PSR in the /accepted folder of the repo"
> 
> Maybe
> 
> auto-incremented from the highest numbered accepted or draft PSR, whichever is higher
> 
> I am not a great wordsmith, but I think it would be clearer.
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.