Correcting typos in the comments (KPP was claiming to do double diffusion mixing, and I had misspelled "parameterization" in some of the comments; both are hazards that come with cpying and pasting an entire module to use as a template for a new module...)

Thanks for catching this, Steve.



git-svn-id: https://cvmix.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@258 ec264166-b127-864d-6cb2-e100125a5c76
Updated discussion of KPP to incorporate the simpler matching condition recommended for CVMix.

git-svn-id: https://cvmix.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@259 ec264166-b127-864d-6cb2-e100125a5c76
As Steve suspected, I had left out an OBL_depth term from a couple of equations. Steve, I don't have a good test for the special case yet... can you let me know if this gets you the value you expect?

git-svn-id: https://cvmix.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@260 ec264166-b127-864d-6cb2-e100125a5c76