rwsem: simplify rwsem_down_read_failed

When trying to acquire a read lock, the RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS adjustment
doesn't cause other readers to block, so we never have to worry about waking
them back after canceling this adjustment in rwsem_down_read_failed().

We also never want to steal the lock in rwsem_down_read_failed(), so we
don't have to grab the wait_lock either.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: simplify rwsem_down_write_failed

When waking writers, we never grant them the lock - instead, they have
to acquire it themselves when they run, and remove themselves from the
wait_list when they succeed.

As a result, we can do a few simplifications in rwsem_down_write_failed():

- We don't need to check for !waiter.task since __rwsem_do_wake() doesn't
  remove writers from the wait_list

- There is no point releaseing the wait_lock before entering the wait loop,
  as we will need to reacquire it immediately. We can change the loop so
  that the lock is always held at the start of each loop iteration.

- We don't need to get a reference on the task structure, since the task
  is responsible for removing itself from the wait_list. There is no risk,
  like in the rwsem_down_read_failed() case, that a task would wake up and
  exit (thus destroying its task structure) while __rwsem_do_wake() is
  still running - wait_lock protects against that.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: more agressive lock stealing in rwsem_down_write_failed

Some small code simplifications can be achieved by doing more agressive
lock stealing:

- When rwsem_down_write_failed() notices that there are no active locks
  (and thus no thread to wake us if we decided to sleep), it used to wake
  the first queued process. However, stealing the lock is also sufficient
  to deal with this case, so we don't need this check anymore.

- In try_get_writer_sem(), we can steal the lock even when the first waiter
  is a reader. This is correct because the code path that wakes readers is
  protected by the wait_lock. As to the performance effects of this change,
  they are expected to be minimal: readers are still granted the lock
  (rather than having to acquire it themselves) when they reach the front
  of the wait queue, so we have essentially the same behavior as in
  rwsem-spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: use cmpxchg for trying to steal write lock

Using rwsem_atomic_update to try stealing the write lock forced us to
undo the adjustment in the failure path. We can have simpler and faster
code by using cmpxchg instead.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: avoid taking wait_lock in rwsem_down_write_failed

In rwsem_down_write_failed(), if there are active locks after we wake up
(i.e. the lock got stolen from us), skip taking the wait_lock and go back
to sleep immediately.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: skip initial trylock in rwsem_down_write_failed

We can skip the initial trylock in rwsem_down_write_failed() if there are
known active lockers already, thus saving one likely-to-fail cmpxchg.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: simplify __rwsem_do_wake

This is mostly for cleanup value:

- We don't need several gotos to handle the case where the first
  waiter is a writer. Two simple tests will do (and generate very
  similar code).

- In the remainder of the function, we know the first waiter is a reader,
  so we don't have to double check that. We can use do..while loops
  to iterate over the readers to wake (generates slightly better code).

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: implement support for write lock stealing on the fastpath

When we decide to wake up readers, we must first grant them as many
read locks as necessary, and then actually wake up all these readers.
But in order to know how many read shares to grant, we must first
count the readers at the head of the queue. This might take a while
if there are many readers, and we want to be protected against a
writer stealing the lock while we're counting. To that end, we grant
the first reader lock before counting how many more readers are queued.

We also require some adjustments to the wake_type semantics.

RWSEM_WAKE_NO_ACTIVE used to mean that we had found the count to
be RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, in which case the rwsem was known to be free
as nobody could steal it while we hold the wait_lock. This doesn't
make sense once we implement fastpath write lock stealing, so we now
use RWSEM_WAKE_ANY in that case.

Similarly, when rwsem_down_write_failed found that a read lock was active,
it would use RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED which signalled that new readers could
be woken without checking first that the rwsem was available. We can't do
that anymore since the existing readers might release their read locks,
and a writer could steal the lock before we wake up additional readers.
So, we have to use a new RWSEM_WAKE_READERS value to indicate we only want
to wake readers, but we don't currently hold any read lock.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
rwsem: do not block readers at head of queue if other readers are active

This change fixes a race condition where a reader might determine it
needs to block, but by the time it acquires the wait_lock the rwsem
has active readers and no queued waiters.

In this situation the reader can just in parallel with the existing active
readers; it does not need to block until the active readers complete.

Thanks to Peter Hurley for noticing this possible race.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
cpufreq: Resolve CPUFREQ_NOTIFY issue

When the cpufreq_stat receives the frequency policy notification,
it checks if the frequency table and stats table are present for the cpu.
If both are present, it returns with -EBUSY error to the notification.
Due to this, none of the other registered modules receive this
notification.

If the stat table and sysfs nodes are already created, return 0 instead
of returning EBUSY error.

Change-Id: I1fd4a46e6a65edfc6253c4271288f10912ae2ad7
Signed-off-by: Archana Sathyakumar <asathyak@codeaurora.org>
Staging: zram: Remove useless offset calculation in handle_uncompressed_page()

The offset of uncompressed page is always zero: handle_uncompressed_page()
doesn't have to care about it.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Staging: zram: Refactor zram_read/write() functions

This patch refactor the code of zram_read/write() functions. It does
not removes a lot of duplicate code alone, but is mostly a helper for
the third patch of this series (Staging: zram: allow partial page
operations).

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Staging: zram: allow partial page operations

Commit 7b19b8d45b216ff3186f066b31937bdbde066f08 (zram: Prevent overflow
in logical block size) introduced ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE constant to
prevent overflow of logical block size on 64k page kernel.
However, the current implementation of zram only allow operation on block
of the same size as a page. That makes theorically legit 4k requests fail
on 64k page kernel.

This patch makes zram allow operation on partial pages. Basically, it
means we still do operations on full pages internally, but only copy the
relevent segments from/to the user memory.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Staging: zram: Replace mutex lock by a R/W semaphore

Currently, nothing protects zram table from concurrent access.
For instance, ZRAM_UNCOMPRESSED bit can be cleared by zram_free_page()
called from a concurrent write between the time ZRAM_UNCOMPRESSED has
been set and the time it is tested to unmap KM_USER0 in
zram_bvec_write(). This ultimately leads to kernel panic.

Also, a read request can occurs when the page has been freed by a
running write request and before it has been updated, leading to
zero filled block being incorrectly read and "Read before write"
error message.

This patch replace the current mutex by a rw_semaphore. It extends
the protection to zram table (currently, only compression buffers are
protected) and read requests (currently, only write requests are
protected).

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Staging: zram: Fix kunmapping order

This patch fixes the unmapping order of KM_USER0/1 in
handle_uncompressed_page() and zram_read() so that kmap()/kunmap() calls
are correctly nested.

Reported-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
staging: zram: make global var "num_devices" use unique name

The global variable "num_devices" is too general to be
global. This patch switches the name to be "zram_num_devices".

Signed-off-by: Noah Watkins <noahwatkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
staging: zram: fix zram locking

Currently init_lock only prevents concurrent execution of zram_init_device()
and zram_reset_device() but not zram_make_request() nor sysfs store functions.

This patch changes init_lock into a rw_semaphore. A write lock is taken by
init, reset and store functions, a read lock is taken by zram_make_request().
Also, avoids to release the lock before calling __zram_reset_device() for
cleaning after a failed init, thus preventing any concurrent task to see an
inconsistent state of zram.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
staging: zram: prevent accessing an unallocated table when init fails early

When the allocation of zram->table fails, we set zram->disksize to zero
to prevent accessing the unallocated table entries during cleanup.
However, we currently don't take this precaution when the initialization
fails earlier.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
zram: Fix sparse warnings

Fixes sparse warning:
zram_drv.c:666:6: warning: symbol 'zram_slot_free_notify' was not
declared. Should it be static?

Also, max_zpage_size is now size_t just to be consistent with data-type
of other variables maintaining sizes of various kinds.

Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Staging: zram/zram_sysfs.c: Fixed call of obsolete function strict_strtoX

As reported by checkpatch.pl strict_strtoX is obsolet and should be
replaced by kstrtoX.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Datsevich <srgdts@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Meier <bjoernmeier@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>