line 2: Σακχαῖος → Σακβέλιος based on digital image (psi-online), supported by the duplicate P.Mich. V 309.2
line 4: πάντα → παντὸς based on digital image: the sigma is pretty clear, and παντὸς is expected, as in the duplicate, line 3
line 5: Φιλήμονος → ψιλὸς τώπος (l. τόπος) based on digital image, entering also the BL correction 3.226 which had suggested simply → ψιλὸς τόπος
line 6: ε̣π̣ικαρουχινοι → ἕτ̣ε̣ροι ψ̣ιλοὶ based on digital image, supported by the duplicate, line 5
line 10: Ταορσεῦτος → Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) based on the digital image: where ed. pr. read -ος it seems clear that there is only a single letter written, and while it is slightly more curved than other iotas in this hand, it is much closer to iota than sigma [I am also proposing correcting the duplicate, line 9, to the same reading; ed. pr. Ταορσεῦτ<ο>ς]


 - line 2: Σακχαῖος → Σακβέλιος based on digital image (psi-online), supported by the duplicate P.Mich. V 309.2
line 4: πάντα → παντὸς based on digital image: the sigma is pretty clear, and παντὸς is expected, as in the duplicate, line 3
line 5: Φιλήμονος → ψιλὸς τώπος (l. τόπος) based on digital image, entering also the BL correction 3.226 which had suggested simply → ψιλὸς τόπος
line 6: ε̣π̣ικαρουχινοι → ἕτ̣ε̣ροι ψ̣ιλοὶ based on digital image, supported by the duplicate, line 5
line 10: Ταορσεῦτος → Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) based on the digital image: where ed. pr. read -ος it seems clear that there is only a single letter written, and while it is slightly more curved than other iotas in this hand, it is much closer to iota than sigma [I am also proposing correcting the duplicate, line 9, to the same reading; ed. pr. Ταορσεῦτ<ο>ς]

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
line 1: Ἁρυώτηι → Ἁρυώτῃ based on digital image (Michigan APIS): the adscript is not present
line 9: Ταορσεῦτ<ο>ς → Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) based on the digital image. Sigma in this hand has a more pronounced curvature; iota can be slightly curved, as in the second iota in πρόκειται (line 10)
subscriptions, line 1: τεσσαράκοντα → τεσσεράκοντα based on digital image


 - line 1: Ἁρυώτηι → Ἁρυώτῃ based on digital image (Michigan APIS): the adscript is not present
line 9: Ταορσεῦτ<ο>ς → Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) based on the digital image. Sigma in this hand has a more pronounced curvature; iota can be slightly curved, as in the second iota in πρόκειται (line 10)
subscriptions, line 1: τεσσαράκοντα → τεσσεράκοντα based on digital image

Signed-off-by: Joshua D. Sosin <joshuad.sosin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Cowey <james.cowey@urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Signed-off-by: Rodney Ast <simoeis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Heilporn <paul.heilporn@unistra.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kruse <thomas.kruse@oeaw.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Cisca Hoogendijk <ciscahoogendijk@live.nl>
Signed-off-by: Graham Claytor <gclaytor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Depauw <mark.depauw@arts.kuleuven.be>
Signed-off-by: Lajos Berkes <berkes.lajos@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmelz <georg.schmelz@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alain Delattre <adelattr@ulb.ac.be>
Signed-off-by: Jenny Cromwell <jenniferacromwell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonia Sarri <toniasarri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian-Jürgen Gruber <morunculus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hélène Cuvigny <h.cuvigny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: W. Graham Claytor <gclaytor@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Verhoogt <verhoogt@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Esther Garel <esthergarel@gmail.com>
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Lin1: I am not fully persuaded by Ἁρυώτηι → Ἁρυώτῃ ; it is the end of the line and the papyrus is slightly damaged; I could not swear that there is no iota there. Lin9 Ταορσεῦτ<ο>ς → Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) seems a bit of a coin-toss to me. The iota would be more curved than the others in m2; but the sigma would be less round than the others in m2. But PSI VIII 916.10 also reads (new reading my Zellmann-Rohrer) Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος), which supports Ταορσεῦτι. So, I am inclined to accept. Lin1 subscr τεσσεράκοντα is clear. (Joshua D. Sosin)
 - Vote - AcceptText - MZR is right about Ἁρυώτῃ in line 1.  There is no iota adscript (Sosin appears to have been looking at Ἁρυώτου at the very end of the line).  I am willing to accept Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) in line 9.  As an iota it is slightly more curved than, e.g., that at the end of πρόκειται in ln. 10, but as Sosin points out comparison with PSI 8.916.10 encourages adopting Ταορσεῦτι.  Lin1 subscr τεσσεράκοντα is fine. (Rodney Ast)
 - Finalized - ready (Joshua D. Sosin)
Update revisionDesc

 - Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Lin2 Σακβέλιος clearly legible in PSI image online (http://psi-online.it/documents/psi;8;916); lin4 I think παντὸς is also quite clear (more than just the sigma; I see tau omicron well enough too); lin5 ψιλὸς τώπος (l. τόπος) also clear in my view. Lin6 I agree the text must read ἕτεροι ψιλοὶ but I cannot quite see that in the image; I see ε followed by what looks like space for 3 letters (not 2), then ροι (clearly); in the next word I think I can make out -οι, but cannot see ψιλ in the traces preceding. I think the reading ought to be right and would urge retaining, but dotting: ἕτ̣ε̣ροι ψ̣ι̣λ̣οὶ. Lin10 the hand is so shaky that it is hard to tell, but Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος) is plausible; the scribe clearly did not write Ταορσεῦτος (note BTW that the scribe very clearly wrote μητρρος in lin10, whether dittography or a failed attempt to go back over the first ρ I don't know) (Joshua D. Sosin)
 - Vote - AcceptText - Σακβέλιος (ln 1), παντὸς (ln 4), and ψιλὸς τώπος (ln 5) are good.  I agree with Sosin that more dotting in line 6 ( ἕτ̣ε̣ροι ψ̣ι̣λ̣οὶ) may be in order; it looks as if damage to the papyrus caused the writer to leave a space between ε and τεροι.  The proposed emendation to line 10, Ταορσεῦτι (l. Ταορσεῦτος), is also good. (Rodney Ast)
 - Finalized - ready (Joshua D. Sosin)
Finalization merge of branch 'DDbDP_Editorial_Board/finalizing/2013/11/14/PSI_8_916dupl' into canonical master