msm:rq_stats: Register for Cpufreq policy notification

Currently the load of the system is calculated using the max
frequency that is read during startup(It does not get updated
when the policy changes). As a result, the average load of the
system is incorrectly calculated and the system might not bring
the cpus online to manage the additional load. This
reduces the performance of the system.

To fix this issue, register rq_stats to receive cpufreq policy
notifications. Update the policy's max frequency when a
notification is received and use that value to calculate the load.

Change-Id: Icc78e28c736c170e198f723fd96c13dfb2dafe8a
Signed-off-by: Archana Sathyakumar <asathyak@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Anji Jonnala <anjir@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
sched: Set MC (multi-core) sched domain's busy_factor attribute to 1

busy_factor attribute of a scheduler domain causes busy CPUs (CPUs
that are not idle) to load balance less frequently in that domain,
which could impact performance by increasing scheduling latency for
tasks.

As an example, consider MC scheduler domain's attribute values of
max_interval = 4ms and busy_factor = 64. Further consider
max_load_balance_interval = 100 (HZ/10). In this case, a non-idle CPU
could put off load balance check in MC domain by 100ms. This
effectively means that a CPU running a single task in its queue could
fail to notice increased load on another CPU (that is in same MC
domain) for upto 100ms, before picking up load from the overloaded
CPU. Needless to say, this leads to increased scheduling latency for
tasks, affecting performance adversely.

By setting MC domain's busy_factor value to 1, we limit maximum
interval that busy CPU can put off load balance checks to 4ms
(effectively 10ms, given HZ value of 100).

Change-Id: Id45869d06f5556ea8eec602b65c2ffd2143fe060
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
msm: rpm-smd: Configure WQ for higer priority

When the workqueue runs at a lower priority, it gets starved by higher
priority threads. Bump the WQ priority to high to ensure rpm smd work
queue gets a fair chance

Change-Id: I06b864611cf45afe6931d6030327806032894663
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
msm: cpufreq: Configure WQ for higer priority

When the workqueue runs at a lower priority, it gets starved by higher
priority threads. Bump the WQ priority to high to ensure cpufreq work
queue gets a fair scheduling chance

Change-Id: I9e994da94a347dceb884e72ec3dd3da468a4471d
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>

Let's try this again.

Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop()

If one process calls sys_reboot and that process then stops other
CPUs while those CPUs are within a spin_lock() region we can
potentially encounter a deadlock scenario like below.

CPU 0                   CPU 1
-----                   -----
                        spin_lock(my_lock)
smp_send_stop()
 send_IPI               handle_IPI()
                         disable_preemption/irqs
                          while(1);
 <PREEMPT>
spin_lock(my_lock) <--- Waits forever

We shouldn't attempt to run any other tasks after we send a stop
IPI to a CPU so disable preemption so that this task runs to
completion.

Change-Id: I528af0b4448433bd9d6ca12d6a0e2c422a55d4be
CRs-Fixed: 396169
Reported-by: Sundarajan Srinivasan <sundaraj@codeaurora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ARM: Fix negative idle stats for offline cpu

We see negative idle stats because of cpu dying without
cleaning up idle entry statistics. When a cpu is offline,
the most immediate thing you'd want to do is just call
into cpu_die() and not waste time calling notifier(IDLE_START).

CRs-Fixed: 414554
Change-Id: Iadc6a3ca39997e0ccf65d2a29b004e24b1b211a1
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
cpufreq: Retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus

cpufreq's handling of cpu online event can incorrectly initialize
managed_policy->cpus to include offline cpus. This causes cpufreq
governors to include offline cpus in their idle time computation, which
causes frequency to shoot up beyond normal levels (on systems where 2 or
more cpus need to be synchronized wrt frequency change).

This frequency shootup was not seen prior to commit 21111be8 which
changed idle time accounting for offline cpus. Prior to commit 21111be8,
idle time statistics for offline cpus would include their offline time
as well. Post commit 21111be8, offline time is not included in a cpu's
idle time statistics.

As a result, ondemand (or other cpufreq) governors would see unchanged
idle time for offline cpus, causing them to interpret those (offline)
cpus as 100% busy, which is wrong.

This patch fixes the issue by modifying cpufreq's hotplug handling to
retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus field. cpufreq governors
would then skip such offline cpus from idle time calculations.

Change-Id: Id2eba8c0ec3367609369b2e42a4e1386ff2e7ab5
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>