Omit "should" in spec descriptions

The rationale is this: the spec string describes the expected
behavior unconditionally. The code examples, on the other hand,
set up an expectation that is tested with the call to the expect
method. The code examples can violate the expectation, but the
spec string does not. The value of the spec string is as clearly
as possible describing the behavior. Including “should” in that
description adds no value. (From http://rubyspec.org/style_guide/)
Merge pull request #1427 from jfirebaugh/should

Omit "should" in spec descriptions