less gender-specific reference in the opening paragraph

Rather than "fine fellows," which implies a boys' club, how about a slightly more inclusive alliteration? "Crafty coders" perhaps?
Update README.md

Fix typo in Percent Literals
Merge pull request #197 from RunsFor/master

Typo in Percent Literals
added fetch with blocks condition

blocks are lazy evaluated while the default value (provided as second argument) is eagerly evaluated
just a quick typo fix
Merge pull request #199 from trliner/master

just a quick typo fix
further refinement of opening paragraph
updated as per PR comments
Merge pull request #198 from dragosmiron/fetch-with-blocks

added fetch with blocks condition
style fix
Merge pull request #203 from dragosmiron/patch-1

style fix
Merge pull request #188 from drewda/patch-1

less gender-specific reference in the opening paragraph
Prefer Time.now over Time.new

The documentation says now is an alias for new. I believe Time.now more
clearly conveys that it uses the current time, whereas Time.new does not
convey the current time vs. an arbitrary, empty time object.

GitHub search indicates that Time.now is far more popular:

* Time.now has [376,997 code results](https://github.com/search?l=ruby&q=time.now&source=c&type=Code)
* Time.new has [18,858 code results](https://github.com/search?l=ruby&q=time.new&source=c&type=Code)

The ratio of now:new is approximately 20:1.
Merge pull request #206 from mark-rushakoff/time-new-now

Prefer Time.now over Time.new