We have not done this on the 5-10 Haml projects I've seen. Agree the
guideline should focus on source code and readability.

I prefer single quotes in ERb and Haml Rails views for consistency of the
Ruby that is interpolated into it.

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013, Joe Ferris wrote:

> In style/README.md:
>
> > @@ -111,6 +111,18 @@ ERb
> >
> >  * When wrapping long lines, keep the method name on the same line as the ERb.
> >    interpolation operator and keep each method argument on its own line.
> > +* Prefer double quotes for strings.
> > +
> > +HTML
> > +----
> > +
> > +* Prefer double quotes for strings.
> > +
> > +Haml
> > +----
> > +
> > +* Haml uses single quotes by default. Pass `--double-quote-attributes` to
>
> Is this something we've generally done on haml projects? I care more about
> what the source files look like than what the produced HTML looks like. I
> think we could lose this Haml section.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/thoughtbot/guides/pull/96/files#r4632252>
> .
>


-- 
Dan Croak