Oh ok. I see it now. It doesn't show up that way in the email. I would say
skip them in the parser but notify that there were skips.

On Saturday, March 2, 2013, Tim wrote:

> In inspections.csv:
>
> > +85947,82,20120615
> > +85947,92,20120625
> > +85947,87,20121204
> > +85947,94,20121218
> > +85947,95,20121219
> > +85947,99,20121219
> > +86012,98,20121203
> > +86039,94,20120627
> > +86039,98,20120627
> > +86161,77,20121219
> > +86315,98,20120117
> > +86315,97,20120723
> > +86549,98,20120228
> > +86662,87,20120507
> > +86662,91,20120507
> > +86662,90,2
>
> That's bizarre. The comment is on line 2215, but on the pull request
> "Discussion" tab, it shows line 2099. Take a look at the diff page to see
> what's up. Or just look at the end of this file.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/openlexington/Lex_to_LIVES/pull/5/files#r3216759>
> .
>


-- 
Blake Hall
@blakeshall
blakeshall.com <http://www.blakeshall.com>