cpufreq: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues

With cmwq, there's no reason for cpufreq drivers to use separate
workqueues.  Remove the dedicated workqueues from cpufreq_conservative
and cpufreq_ondemand and use system_wq instead.  The work items are
already sync canceled on stop, so it's already guaranteed that no work
is running on module exit.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Blechd0se <alex.christ@hotmail.de>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
[CPUFREQ] calculate delay after dbs_check_cpu

calculate ondemand delay after dbs_check_cpu call because it can
modify rate_mult value

use freq_lo_jiffies value for the sub sample period of powersave_bias mode

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
nohz: Fix update_ts_time_stat idle accounting

update_ts_time_stat currently updates idle time even if we are in
iowait loop at the moment. The only real users of the idle counter
(via get_cpu_idle_time_us) are CPU governors and they expect to get
cumulative time for both idle and iowait times.
The value (idle_sleeptime) is also printed to userspace by print_cpu
but it prints both idle and iowait times so the idle part is misleading.

Let's clean this up and fix update_ts_time_stat to account both counters
properly and update consumers of idle to consider iowait time as well.
If we do this we might use get_cpu_{idle,iowait}_time_us from other
contexts as well and we will get expected values.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9c909c221a8da402c4da07e4cd968c3218f8eb1.1314172057.git.mhocko@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Blechd0se <alex.christ@hotmail.de>

Conflicts:
	kernel/time/tick-sched.c
[CPUFREQ] Remove wall variable from cpufreq_gov_dbs_init()

CPUFREQ Remove wall variable from cpufreq_gov_dbs_init()

Remove wall variable from cpufreq_gov_dbs_init() as
get_cpu_idle_time_us() no longer updates the last_update_time
unconditionally. Passing non-NULL last_update_time address
will result in accounting additional idle time with
update_ts_time_stats() before returning idle_sleeptime.

Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
--
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[CPUFREQ] CPUfreq ondemand: update sampling rate without waiting for next sampling

When a new sampling rate is shorter than the current one, (e.g., 1 sec
--> 10 ms) regardless how short the new one is, the current ondemand
mechanism wait for the previously set timer to be expired.

For example, if the user has just expressed that the sampling rate
should be 10 ms from now and the previous was 1000 ms, the new rate may
become effective 999 ms later, which could be not acceptable for the
user if the user has intended to speed up sampling because the system is
expected to react to CPU load fluctuation quickly from __now__.

In order to address this issue, we need to cancel the previously set
timer (schedule_delayed_work) and reset the timer if resetting timer is
expected to trigger the delayed_work ealier.

Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Blechd0se <alex.christ@hotmail.de>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
[CPUFREQ] Remove old, deprecated per cpu ondemand/conservative sysfs files

Marked deprecated for quite a whilte now...

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
CC: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Blechd0se <alex.christ@hotmail.de>

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
	include/linux/cpufreq.h