Sure. Remnants of trying to get function calling working entirely through
the abstract interface.


On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM, John Benediktsson <notifications@github.com
> wrote:

> In talib/abstract.pyx:
>
> > +def _ta_getOutputParameterInfo(char *function_name, int idx):
> > +    ''' Returns the function's output info dict for the given index. It has two
> > +    keys: name and flags.
> > +    '''
> > +    cdef abstract.TA_OutputParameterInfo *info
> > +    retCode = abstract.TA_GetOutputParameterInfo(__ta_getFuncHandle(function_name), idx, &info)
> > +    _ta_check_success('TA_GetOutputParameterInfo', retCode)
> > +
> > +    name = info.paramName
> > +    name = name[len('out'):].lower()
> > +    # chop off leading 'real' if a descriptive name follows
> > +    if 'real' in name and name not in ['real', 'real0', 'real1']:
> > +        name = name[len('real'):]
> > +
> > +    ret = { 'name': name,
> > +            #'type': info.type,
>
> Remove this?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/mrjbq7/ta-lib/pull/18/files#r2787552>.
>
>