cpufreq: Retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus

cpufreq's handling of cpu online event can incorrectly initialize
managed_policy->cpus to include offline cpus. This causes cpufreq
governors to include offline cpus in their idle time computation, which
causes frequency to shoot up beyond normal levels (on systems where 2 or
more cpus need to be synchronized wrt frequency change).

This frequency shootup was not seen prior to commit 21111be8 which
changed idle time accounting for offline cpus. Prior to commit 21111be8,
idle time statistics for offline cpus would include their offline time
as well. Post commit 21111be8, offline time is not included in a cpu's
idle time statistics.

As a result, ondemand (or other cpufreq) governors would see unchanged
idle time for offline cpus, causing them to interpret those (offline)
cpus as 100% busy, which is wrong.

This patch fixes the issue by modifying cpufreq's hotplug handling to
retain only online cpus in managed_policy->cpus field. cpufreq governors
would then skip such offline cpus from idle time calculations.

Change-Id: Id2eba8c0ec3367609369b2e42a4e1386ff2e7ab5
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Only apply driver limits for scaling_min/max_freq writes

When new values are written to scaling_min/max_freq sysfs files, the
current code applies all the limits imposed by various ADJUST and
INCOMPATIBLE notifiers handlers before storing them.

When the ADJUST and/or INCOMPATIBLE notifiers change their limits
frequently, this behavior makes it almost impossible for a
user/userspace process to store the scaling_min/max_freq limits
that go beyond the instantaneous limits imposed by the notifiers.
Since these sysfs nodes are typically meant to set limits that need
to be enforced for the foreseeable future, this is not a very user
friendly behavior.

So, change the behavior to only apply limits that are enforced by
the cpufreq driver. Typically, these are just the absolute limits
of the HW and don't change very often.

Change-Id: I1ccfaa2d1ee4ea595f882485d359dbdb407a0176
Signed-off-by: Deepak Katragadda <dkatraga@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: fix a race between hotplug and cpufreq

When msm_cpufreq_target() is called without holding the policy
semaphore, there is a rare chance that the cpu gets hotplugged in
the acpuclk_set_rate. The probability of this issue increases
when cross-calling is used or using interactive governor which
tries to set all cpu frequencies from a single thread.

Add a hotplug notifier and set the device_suspended flag holding
the suspend mutex, when cpu is going down. This mutex is always
held when frequency changes are done.

Change-Id: Ide3aa6927ad60d2512d63761c51bb15117461250
Signed-off-by: Narayanan Gopalakrishnan <nargop@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: increase priority of thread that increases frequencies

When the cpufreq governors request for increase in frequency from kworker
threads, there is chance that the kworker thread is cpu starved due to
other high priority threads, leading to undesirable increase in frequency
ramp-up latency. Add the calling thread to SCHED_FIFO policy when
requesting for increase in frequency and restore back to original policy
after ramp-up is completed.

Change-Id: Ie4fa199b7f9087717cb94dfcc2eddea27cc0012b
Signed-off-by: Narayanan Gopalakrishnan <nargop@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Always update frequency limits when core is online

Remove condition in msm_cpufreq_init() so that when cpu is set to
online, it will call set_cpu_freq() and update the frequency limits.

CRs-Fixed: 462816
Change-Id: I40ac33c9cb4b42590a83f9d61b74f23379f5642e
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Liu <chihning@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:

	arch/arm/mach-msm/cpufreq.c
msm: cpufreq: Configure WQ for higer priority

When the workqueue runs at a lower priority, it gets starved by higher
priority threads. Bump the WQ priority to high to ensure cpufreq work
queue gets a fair scheduling chance

Change-Id: I9e994da94a347dceb884e72ec3dd3da468a4471d
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:

	arch/arm/mach-msm/cpufreq.c
msm: cpufreq: Relax constraints on "msm-cpufreq" workqueue

This workqueue is not used in memory reclaim paths, so the
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag is not needed. Additionally, there is no
need to restrict the queue to having one in-flight work item.
Remove these constraints.

Change-Id: I9edde40917d3ec885ce061133de20680634321d0
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:

	arch/arm/mach-msm/cpufreq.c
msm: cpufreq: Ensure cpufreq change happens on corresponding CPU

Checking the cpus_allowed mask of the current thread before changing the
frequency doesn't guarantee that the rest of the execution will continue on
the same CPU. The only way to guarantee this is to schedule a work on the
specific CPU and also prevent hotplug  of that CPU (already done by
existing code).

Change-Id: I51a02fcc777a47d3c16f2d83c47e96f2c59f7ae6
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:

	arch/arm/mach-msm/cpufreq.c