Nil is meant to indicate the nil class, but you're right, they're
effectively the same. It's mainly a (legacy?) style thing.  I agree with
using Nil here.


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Jeff Hui <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In Spec/Matchers/Base/ConformToSpec.mm:
>
> > +@interface Conformer : NSObject
> > +    <IConformer>
> > +
> > +@end
> > +
> > +@implementation Conformer
> > +@end
> > +
> > +using namespace Cedar::Matchers;
> > +
> > +SPEC_BEGIN(ConformToSpec)
> > +
> > +describe(@"conform_to matcher", ^{
> > +
> > +    context(@"when called on class", ^{
> > +        __block Class subject = Nil;
>
> Actually, scratch it. It's fine. Sorry for all the trouble.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pivotal/cedar/pull/134/files#r7440405>
> .
>