sched: Unthrottle rt runqueues in __disable_runtime()

migrate_tasks() uses _pick_next_task_rt() to get tasks from the
real-time runqueues to be migrated. When rt_rq is throttled
_pick_next_task_rt() won't return anything, in which case
migrate_tasks() can't move all threads over and gets stuck in an
infinite loop.

Instead unthrottle rt runqueues before migrating tasks.

Additionally: move unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() to rq_offline_fair()

Change-Id: If8a4a399f1a14b7f4789c1b205dcfadbde555214
Signed-off-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5FBF8E85CA34454794F0F7ECBA79798F379D3648B7@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Git-commit: a4c96ae319b8047f62dedbe1eac79e321c185749
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Signed-off-by: Syed Rameez Mustafa <rameezmustafa@codeaurora.org>
mm: remove swap token code

The swap token code no longer fits in with the current VM model.  It
does not play well with cgroups or the better NUMA placement code in
development, since we have only one swap token globally.

It also has the potential to mess with scalability of the system, by
increasing the number of non-reclaimable pages on the active and
inactive anon LRU lists.

Last but not least, the swap token code has been broken for a year
without complaints, as reported by Konstantin Khlebnikov.  This suggests
we no longer have much use for it.

The days of sub-1G memory systems with heavy use of swap are over.  If
we ever need thrashing reducing code in the future, we will have to
implement something that does scale.

Change-Id: I6d287cfc3c3206ca24da2de0c1392e5fdfcfabe8
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Bob Picco <bpicco@meloft.net>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Git-commit: e709ffd6169ccd259eb5874e853303e91e94e829
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
sched: re-calculate a cpu's next_balance point upon sched domain changes

Commit 55ddeb0f (sched: Reset rq->next_interval before going idle) reset
a cpu's rq->next_balance when pulled_task = 0, which will be true when
the cpu failed to pull any task, causing it go idle. However that patch
relied on next_balance being calculated as a result of traversing cpu's
sched domain hierarchy.

A cpu that is the only online cpu will however not be attached to any
sched domain hierarchy. When such a cpu calls into idle_balance(), we
will end up initializing next_balance to be 1sec away! Such a CPU will
defer load balance check for another 1sec, even though we may bring up
more cpus in the meantime requiring it to check for load imbalance more
frequently. This could then lead to increased scheduling latency for
some tasks.

This patch results in a cpu's next_balance being re-calculated when its
attaching to a new sched domain hierarchy.  This should let cpus call
load balance checks at the right time we expect them to!

Change-Id: I855cff8da5ca28d278596c3bb0163b839d4704bc
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>