Yes. So you think we should keep it as is until we change the
implementation of series? What I was thinking was that, even with current
series implemention and this patch, you could have a larger series.

Best Regards

Shixin Zeng


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Andreas Bolka <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In src/core/m-pools.c:
>
> > @@ -368,7 +368,11 @@
> >
> >  	CHECK_STACK(&series);
> >
> > +#ifdef __LP64__
> > +	if (((REBU64)length * wide) > MAX_I64) Trap0(RE_NO_MEMORY);
>
> Recovering an earlier comment of Ladislav<https://github.com/zsx/r3/commit/bebdda231deb8a6b068eb421f33c60912944ee7c#commitcomment-4014963>
> :
>
> "The limit change looks premature, since the implementation of series
> hasn't changed yet."
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/rebol/rebol/pull/142/files#r6246850>
> .
>