Not really, the german one agree in some cases. Only the chicago manual 
of style agree. Also, why should be put footnote after ponctuation but 
quotation before? It is not really homogenous. What is better for you? 
(Elyse agree that footnote after punctuation is really ugly). With just 
a sentence it is not a real problem but with multiple sentense, it looks 
like the footnote refere to the next sentence.

Le 05/09/2013 09:32, serge-sans-paille a écrit :
>
> In doc/papers/sc2013/paper.tex:
>
> > @@ -491,13 +493,14 @@ \subsection{Directives}
> >  Python decorators.}, it only applies to functions, methods and classes and does
> >  not make it possible to attach decorations to other statements.
> >  PLW~\cite{dongara2007}, uses string instructions to hold such decorations. As
> > -Python does not have anonymous block,~\footnote{\see PEP340,
> > -    \url{http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0340/} for a discussion concerning
> > +Python does not have anonymous block~\footnote{\see PEP340,
> > +    \url{http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0340/}, for a discussion concerning
>
> http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/15342/footnote-endnote-references-before-or-after-punctuation-comma-full-stop-perio
>
> disagrees with you
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran/pull/148/files#r6175364>.
>