>     as per [1]#392 I don't think it does.
> ah -- I thought you fixed it if it didn't... am I wrong?

Got distracted when writing doco. Always a bad case. Yes #392 does fix it.

So ready to merge both of these? I think most of the other pull request I have are ready too with perhaps some feedback on the selinux one - I'm liking the branch mentioned in the pull request better at this stage.

> major overhaul of jail.conf is in 0.9 .  Here we better minimize the
> changes so upgrades would not be too difficult (for Debian I maintain
> separate jail.conf anyways, which served as a basis for the one in 0.9)

Yeh, I like the neatness of the config in the 0.9 branch.