xfstests: add fio requirement V2

FIO is very flexible io generator, I would call it IO swiss knife.
Currently we have tonns of hardcoded application which reproduces
some predefined scenario. This approach has obvious dissadvantages
1) Lack of flexability: one written it is hard to modify it in future
2) Code base is large, many routines written again and again

At the same time add new fio based tast is just add simle INI file.
This greatly simplify code review. I do beleve that some day we will
replace most of hardcoded io binaries with fio.

One who is planning to run $FIO_PROG should first check that system
contains appropriate version which is able to handle jobfile
for example:  _require_fio 286-job.fio
xfstests: get rid of hardcoded /sbin/mkfs
xfstest: add configurable load factors

Most stress test has probable behaviour, the longer test run the
larger corner cases will be cover. It is reasonable to allow
user to provide some sort of system load factor.
This patch introduce two global variables
LOAD_FACTOR: Usually means factor number of running tasks
TIME_FACTOR: Usually means factor of run time, or number of operations 
If not speficied both variables defined to 1, so original behaviour
preserved.

TODO: Change all stress tests to use this variables
xfstest: allow fsstress to use load factor where appropriate

1) Add _scale_fsstress_args function which transform argumets according
   to load factors
2) Let all non deterministic fsstress tests to use scaled arguments

I've able to trigger OOPS on xfs see:https://gist.github.com/dmonakhov/4762653
xfstest: move run_check to common.rc
xfstest: add  fallocate/truncate vs AIO/DIO stress test

Run  DIO, fallocate and truncate threads on a common file in parallel.
If race exist old dio request may rewrite blocks after it was allocated
to another file, we will catch that by verifying blocks content.

this patch known to catch deadlock for ext4
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2012/09/06/3
xfstest: add  fallocate/punch_hole vs AIO/DIO stress test

Run  random AIO/DIO activity (fio's job:direct_aio_raicer)
random fallocate activity(fio's job:falloc_raicer)
and random punch_hole activity(punch_hole_raicer) on a common
file in parallel. If race exist old dio request may rewrite
punched block after it was allocated to another file, we will
catch that by verifier fio's job: "aio-dio-verifier".
xfstest: add defragmentation stress tests for ext4

Perform various regression tests for ext4defrag  subsystem

 288'th Test1: Defragment file while other task does direct AIO
 289'th Test2: Perform defragmentation on file under buffered AIO
 	while third task does direct AIO to donor file
 290'th Test3: Two defrag tasks use common donor file.
 291'th Test4: Stress defragmentation. Several threads pefrorm
 	fragmentation at random position use inplace=1 will
	allocate and free blocks inside defrag event improve
	load pressure.

This tests are considered dengerous because 289'th and 290'th are known
to trigger OOPS on recent kernels see:https://gist.github.com/dmonakhov/4770294
xfstests: add disk failure simulation test

There are many situation where disk may fail for example
1) brutal usb dongle unplug
2) iscsi (or any other netbdev) failure due to network issues
In this situation filesystem which use this blockdevice is
expected to fail(force RO remount, abort, etc) but whole system
should still be operational. In other words:
1) Kernel should not panic
2) Memory should not leak
3) Data integrity operations (sync,fsync,fdatasync, directio) should fail
   for affected filesystem 
4) It should be possible to umount broken filesystem

Later when disk becomes available again we expect(only for journaled filesystems):
5) It will be possible to mount filesystem w/o explicit fsck (in order to caught
   issues like https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1983981/)
6) Filesystem should be operational
7) After mount/umount has being done all errors should be fixed so fsck should
   not spot any issues.

This test use fault enjection (CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST=y config option )
which force all new IO requests to fail for a given device. Xfs already has
XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN ioctl which provides similar behaviour, but it is fsspeciffic
and it does it in light whay because it perform freeze_bdev() before actual
shotdown.

Test run fsstress in background and then force disk failure.
Once disk failed it check that (1)-(4) is true.
Then makes disk available again and check that (5)-(7) is also true

BE CAREFUL!! test known to cause memory corruption for XFS
see: https://gist.github.com/dmonakhov/4945005diff --git a/292 b/292
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..1ab46cc