Just following up as it's not my intention to hold up this pull request. It's your repo, @retornam, so ultimately it's your call. The fact that all of the other link-checking tests in mcom-tests were updated to use a specific logic that will ensure that *all* links will be checked every time still has me scratching my head about why this one test should be the exception. We will end up with less (potential) coverage, plus it introduces an inconsistency to the tests that could be confusing to a new contributor who looks at the code and tries to understand how to best write such a test. If you are fine with both of those issues just say so and we needn't continue the debate.