test/shift1.go: recognize gccgo errors

R=golang-dev, remyoudompheng, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10524045
test: match gccgo error strings.

R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10468043
misc/dashboard: show all race builders as "race"
race is more important than arch (moreover race implies x64)
don't know how to test it

R=golang-dev, dave, r
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10484046
cmd/go: log compilation errors when scanning directories and packages
Before, some packages disappear silently if the package cannot be imported,
such as if the import statement is unparseable.
Before:
        % ls src
        foo   issue
        % go list ./...
        _/home/r/bug/src/foo
        %
After:
        % go list ./...
        src/issue/issue.go:3:5: expected 'STRING', found newline
        _/home/r/bug/src/foo
        %

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10568043
crypto/md5: provide a top-level Sum function
Makes it easy to ask the simple question, what is the hash of this data?
Also mark block as non-escaping.

R=golang-dev, agl
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10624044
cmd/go: proper rebuild of affected packages during go test

With this CL, go test -short -cover std successfully builds and
runs all the standard package tests. The tests that look a file
line numbers (log and runtime/debug) fail, because cover is
not inserting //line directives. Everything else passes.

ok  	cmd/api	0.038s	coverage: 66.6% of statements
?   	cmd/cgo	[no test files]
ok  	cmd/fix	0.043s	coverage: 27.2% of statements
ok  	cmd/go	0.063s	coverage: 2.4% of statements
?   	cmd/godoc	[no test files]
ok  	cmd/gofmt	0.085s	coverage: 61.3% of statements
?   	cmd/yacc	[no test files]
ok  	archive/tar	0.023s	coverage: 74.2% of statements
ok  	archive/zip	0.075s	coverage: 71.8% of statements
ok  	bufio	0.149s	coverage: 88.2% of statements
ok  	bytes	0.135s	coverage: 90.4% of statements
ok  	compress/bzip2	0.087s	coverage: 85.1% of statements
ok  	compress/flate	0.632s	coverage: 79.3% of statements
ok  	compress/gzip	0.027s	coverage: 76.7% of statements
ok  	compress/lzw	0.141s	coverage: 71.2% of statements
ok  	compress/zlib	1.123s	coverage: 77.2% of statements
ok  	container/heap	0.020s	coverage: 85.8% of statements
ok  	container/list	0.021s	coverage: 92.5% of statements
ok  	container/ring	0.030s	coverage: 86.5% of statements
?   	crypto	[no test files]
ok  	crypto/aes	0.054s	coverage: 54.3% of statements
ok  	crypto/cipher	0.027s	coverage: 68.8% of statements
ok  	crypto/des	0.041s	coverage: 83.8% of statements
ok  	crypto/dsa	0.027s	coverage: 33.1% of statements
ok  	crypto/ecdsa	0.048s	coverage: 48.7% of statements
ok  	crypto/elliptic	0.030s	coverage: 91.6% of statements
ok  	crypto/hmac	0.019s	coverage: 83.3% of statements
ok  	crypto/md5	0.020s	coverage: 78.7% of statements
ok  	crypto/rand	0.057s	coverage: 20.8% of statements
ok  	crypto/rc4	0.092s	coverage: 70.8% of statements
ok  	crypto/rsa	0.261s	coverage: 80.8% of statements
ok  	crypto/sha1	0.019s	coverage: 83.9% of statements
ok  	crypto/sha256	0.021s	coverage: 89.0% of statements
ok  	crypto/sha512	0.023s	coverage: 88.7% of statements
ok  	crypto/subtle	0.027s	coverage: 83.9% of statements
ok  	crypto/tls	0.833s	coverage: 79.7% of statements
ok  	crypto/x509	0.961s	coverage: 74.9% of statements
?   	crypto/x509/pkix	[no test files]
ok  	database/sql	0.033s	coverage: 75.0% of statements
ok  	database/sql/driver	0.020s	coverage: 46.2% of statements
ok  	debug/dwarf	0.023s	coverage: 71.5% of statements
ok  	debug/elf	0.035s	coverage: 58.2% of statements
ok  	debug/gosym	0.022s	coverage: 1.8% of statements
ok  	debug/macho	0.023s	coverage: 63.7% of statements
ok  	debug/pe	0.024s	coverage: 50.5% of statements
ok  	encoding/ascii85	0.021s	coverage: 89.7% of statements
ok  	encoding/asn1	0.022s	coverage: 77.9% of statements
ok  	encoding/base32	0.022s	coverage: 91.4% of statements
ok  	encoding/base64	0.020s	coverage: 90.7% of statements
ok  	encoding/binary	0.022s	coverage: 66.2% of statements
ok  	encoding/csv	0.022s	coverage: 88.5% of statements
ok  	encoding/gob	0.064s	coverage: 82.2% of statements
ok  	encoding/hex	0.019s	coverage: 86.3% of statements
ok  	encoding/json	0.047s	coverage: 77.3% of statements
ok  	encoding/pem	0.026s	coverage: 80.5% of statements
ok  	encoding/xml	0.039s	coverage: 85.0% of statements
ok  	errors	0.022s	coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok  	expvar	0.048s	coverage: 72.0% of statements
ok  	flag	0.019s	coverage: 86.9% of statements
ok  	fmt	0.062s	coverage: 91.2% of statements
ok  	go/ast	0.028s	coverage: 46.3% of statements
ok  	go/build	0.190s	coverage: 75.4% of statements
ok  	go/doc	0.095s	coverage: 76.7% of statements
ok  	go/format	0.036s	coverage: 79.8% of statements
ok  	go/parser	0.075s	coverage: 82.0% of statements
ok  	go/printer	0.733s	coverage: 88.6% of statements
ok  	go/scanner	0.031s	coverage: 86.5% of statements
ok  	go/token	0.062s	coverage: 79.7% of statements
?   	hash	[no test files]
ok  	hash/adler32	0.029s	coverage: 49.0% of statements
ok  	hash/crc32	0.020s	coverage: 64.2% of statements
ok  	hash/crc64	0.021s	coverage: 53.5% of statements
ok  	hash/fnv	0.018s	coverage: 75.5% of statements
ok  	html	0.022s	coverage: 4.5% of statements
ok  	html/template	0.087s	coverage: 83.9% of statements
ok  	image	0.108s	coverage: 67.1% of statements
ok  	image/color	0.026s	coverage: 20.1% of statements
ok  	image/draw	0.049s	coverage: 69.6% of statements
ok  	image/gif	0.019s	coverage: 65.2% of statements
ok  	image/jpeg	0.197s	coverage: 78.6% of statements
ok  	image/png	0.055s	coverage: 56.5% of statements
ok  	index/suffixarray	0.027s	coverage: 82.4% of statements
ok  	io	0.037s	coverage: 83.4% of statements
ok  	io/ioutil	0.022s	coverage: 70.1% of statements
FAIL	log	0.020s
ok  	log/syslog	2.063s	coverage: 71.1% of statements
ok  	math	0.023s	coverage: 76.5% of statements
ok  	math/big	0.235s	coverage: 79.2% of statements
ok  	math/cmplx	0.020s	coverage: 66.5% of statements
ok  	math/rand	0.031s	coverage: 69.9% of statements
ok  	mime	0.022s	coverage: 83.0% of statements
ok  	mime/multipart	0.389s	coverage: 76.1% of statements
ok  	net	2.219s	coverage: 58.0% of statements
ok  	net/http	4.744s	coverage: 82.9% of statements
ok  	net/http/cgi	0.593s	coverage: 68.5% of statements
ok  	net/http/cookiejar	0.038s	coverage: 90.3% of statements
ok  	net/http/fcgi	0.047s	coverage: 37.6% of statements
ok  	net/http/httptest	0.068s	coverage: 68.9% of statements
ok  	net/http/httputil	0.058s	coverage: 52.8% of statements
?   	net/http/pprof	[no test files]
ok  	net/mail	0.025s	coverage: 80.3% of statements
ok  	net/rpc	0.063s	coverage: 71.5% of statements
ok  	net/rpc/jsonrpc	0.047s	coverage: 81.3% of statements
ok  	net/smtp	0.032s	coverage: 74.1% of statements
ok  	net/textproto	0.023s	coverage: 66.0% of statements
ok  	net/url	0.020s	coverage: 78.2% of statements
ok  	os	4.729s	coverage: 73.3% of statements
ok  	os/exec	39.620s	coverage: 65.1% of statements
ok  	os/signal	0.541s	coverage: 89.9% of statements
ok  	os/user	0.022s	coverage: 62.2% of statements
ok  	path	0.018s	coverage: 90.8% of statements
ok  	path/filepath	10.834s	coverage: 88.4% of statements
ok  	reflect	0.055s	coverage: 83.2% of statements
ok  	regexp	0.084s	coverage: 75.5% of statements
ok  	regexp/syntax	0.547s	coverage: 85.2% of statements
ok  	runtime	4.755s	coverage: 75.9% of statements
?   	runtime/cgo	[no test files]
FAIL	runtime/debug	0.018s
ok  	runtime/pprof	0.368s	coverage: 8.5% of statements
?   	runtime/race	[no test files]
ok  	sort	0.059s	coverage: 97.7% of statements
ok  	strconv	0.315s	coverage: 95.6% of statements
ok  	strings	0.147s	coverage: 96.1% of statements
ok  	sync	0.083s	coverage: 56.7% of statements
ok  	sync/atomic	0.035s	coverage: 0.0% of statements
ok  	syscall	0.043s	coverage: 24.0% of statements
ok  	testing	0.018s	coverage: 24.0% of statements
?   	testing/iotest	[no test files]
ok  	testing/quick	0.062s	coverage: 83.2% of statements
ok  	text/scanner	0.020s	coverage: 91.5% of statements
ok  	text/tabwriter	0.021s	coverage: 90.4% of statements
ok  	text/template	0.052s	coverage: 81.1% of statements
ok  	text/template/parse	0.024s	coverage: 86.1% of statements
ok  	time	2.431s	coverage: 88.8% of statements
ok  	unicode	0.024s	coverage: 92.1% of statements
ok  	unicode/utf16	0.017s	coverage: 97.3% of statements
ok  	unicode/utf8	0.019s	coverage: 97.4% of statements
?   	unsafe	[no test files]

R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10586043
crypto/sha256: provide top-level Sum and Sum224 functions
Makes it easy to ask the simple question, what is the hash of this data?

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10629043
crypto/sha512: provide top-level Sum512 and Sum384 functions
Makes it easy to ask the simple question, what is the hash of this data?
Also fix the commentary and prints in Sum256.

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10630043
A+C: Charles Lee (individual CLA)

Generated by addca.

R=gobot
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/10639043
misc/emacs: fix godef-jump on Windows.

Fixes issue 5555.

R=adonovan, dominik.honnef, iant
CC=gobot, golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/9762045

Committer: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>