I think rspec is good enough for unit testing, wouldn't add
shoulda-matchers myself to spree builds in order to avoid one more
dependency and one more api to learn haha. Either way I'm ok with it as
well if other people find it helps to test.


On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Trung Lê <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In common_spree_dependencies.rb:
>
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >    gem 'launchy'
> >    gem 'pry'
> >    gem 'rspec-rails', '~> 2.14.0'
> > +  gem 'shoulda-matchers'
>
> @radar <https://github.com/radar> @huoxito <https://github.com/huoxito>after looking into
> errors_on, I still think shoulda-matchers offers distinct advantages as
> it is one line that cover all many errors_on examples. I'd like to
> suggest that we go for shoulda-matchers. Thoughts?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/spree/spree/pull/3866/files#r7080769>
> .
>



-- 
Washington L Braga Jr

Developer
Spree Commerce, Inc.