Hallo Merlin,

 

I know you just took this graphic from the FPP, but it doesn’t seems to be a “openETCS” specific graphic. I already discussed this problem with Marc some time ago and we decided that it would be best to use a graphic adapted for the “openETCS” process. Marc already started to draw a first version. So you should ask him, maybe you can just replace the graphic.

 

Best regards

 

Jan

 

Jan Welte

 

____________________________________________________

 

Dipl. Wirtsch.-Ing. Jan Welte

 

Institut für Verkehrssicherheit und Automatisierungstechnik

Technische Universität Braunschweig

 

Tel.: 0531 391-3331

Fax: 0531 391-5197

j.Welte@tu-bs.de

 

Von: Merlin Pokam [mailto:notifications@github.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. März 2013 14:02
An: MerlinPokam/CENELEC-compliance_openETCS
Cc: Jan Welte
Betreff: Re: [CENELEC-compliance_openETCS] Review of document from janwelte (#1)

 

In D_2.1.2/openETCS_CENELEC-compliance_WP2_AEbt_mpo.tex:

> @@ -178,15 +182,17 @@ \section{openETCS tools chain}
>    \label{fig:openETCS1}
>  \end{figure}
>  
> -
> +\fxwarning[draft]{better adopted grafic (ask Marc Behrens for draft)}

Hello Jan, what you mean concretely?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <https://github.com/MerlinPokam/CENELEC-compliance_openETCS/pull/1/files#r3203871> .  <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/Qf2Yqid8pZQgEymGIWxjS2mYynXWWNA8Am3-id6wf7FO8XxhU3pVqDIJxwrIBRkF.gif>