no need to calculate the minimum element in the mass vector
make test fail if multiple files cannot be touched in a spaced dir
add Peter Athron to contributor list
automatically generate tex file with package version
generate macro with package name
do not set SARAH and FlexibleSUSY in typewriter font
rename ParametersToSolveTadpoles to EWSBOutputParameters

This avoids reusing a SARAH variable and better expresses what these
parameters are: output of the EWSB eqs.
Correct documentation of diagonalization functions.
Fix bug in Diagonalize2by2.
Add tests for the wrappers module.
Patch: Jae-hyeon Park
check for SARAH installation in the configure script
print insalled SARAH version
check if sarah version file exists before opening it
check for installed boost version
write out the installed boost version
need to check for the compiler before we can check for the boost version
add automatically generated files to the git-ignore list
add BOOSTFLAGS to compilation command of version test program
check GNU compiler version
correct user message: 4.6.0 is allowed
merge bugfix from Softsusy upstream

Bugfix: avoid undefined behaviour in vector / matrix assignment

The default operator= for vectors and matrices uses the
valarray<>::operator= to assign the the elements.  However, if the the
origin and the target valarrays have different size, the behaviour of
valarray<>::operator= is undefined.  This happens for example in the
NMSSM, where we resize matrices and assign them to smaller ones.

To solve the problem we have to overwrite the default operator= for
all vectors and matrices to ensure that the target valarray is resized
properly before the assignment.
Bugfix: correct association between tree-level and one-loop tadpoles

In the MRSSM the CP even Higgses are defined as

  {{phid, phiu, phiS, phiT}, {hh, ZH}} .

However, the VEVs are ordered like

  {vd, vu, vT, vS} ,

i.e. the order of the vevs is different from the order of the
corresponding Higgs component fields in hh.  So, we have to ensure
that in the four tadpole equations we correctly associate

  vd   <-->   Tadpole of hh(1)
  vu   <-->   Tadpole of hh(2)
  vT   <-->   Tadpole of hh(4)
  vS   <-->   Tadpole of hh(3)

Thanks to Philip Diessner.