misc: uidstat: avoid create_stat() race and blockage.

* create_stat() race would lead to:
  [   58.132324] proc_dir_entry 'uid_stat/10061' already registered

* blocking kmalloc reported by sbranden
 tcp_read_sock()
  uid_stat_tcp_rcv()
    create_stat()
      kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)

Signed-off-by: JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>
ashmem: avoid deadlock between read and mmap calls

Avoid holding ashmem_mutex across code that can page fault.  Page faults
grab the mmap_sem for the process, which are also held by mmap calls
prior to calling ashmem_mmap, which locks ashmem_mutex.  The reversed
order of locking between the two can deadlock.

The calls that can page fault are read() and the ASHMEM_SET_NAME and
ASHMEM_GET_NAME ioctls.  Move the code that accesses userspace pages
outside the ashmem_mutex.

Bug: 9261835
Change-Id: If1322e981d29c889a56cdc9dfcbc6df2729a45e9
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
sched: smart wake-affine

wake-affine stuff is always trying to pull wakee close to waker, by theory,
this will bring benefit if waker's cpu cached hot data for wakee, or the
extreme ping-pong case.

And testing show it could benefit hackbench 15% at most.

However, the whole stuff is somewhat blindly and time-consuming, some
workload therefore suffer.

And testing show it could damage pgbench 50% at most.

Thus, wake-affine stuff should be smarter, and realise when to stop
it's thankless effort.

This patch introduced per task 'nr_wakee_switch', which will be increased
each time the task switch it's wakee.

So a high 'nr_wakee_switch' means the task has more than one wakee, and
less the wakee number, higher the wakeup frequency.

Now when making the decision on whether to pull or not, pay attention on
the wakee with a high 'nr_wakee_switch', pull such task may benefit wakee,
but that imply waker will face cruel competition later, it could be very
crule or very fast depends on the story behind 'nr_wakee_switch', whatever,
waker therefore suffer.

Furthermore, if waker also has a high 'nr_wakee_switch', that imply multiple
tasks rely on it, waker's higher latency will damage all those tasks, pull
wakee in such cases seems to be a bad deal.

Thus, when 'waker->nr_wakee_switch / wakee->nr_wakee_switch' become higher
and higher, the deal seems to be worse and worse.

This patch therefore help wake-affine stuff to stop it's work when:

	wakee->nr_wakee_switch > factor &&
	waker->nr_wakee_switch > (factor * wakee->nr_wakee_switch)
The factor here is the online cpu number, so more cpu will lead to more pull
since the trial become more severe.

After applied the patch, pgbench show 42% improvement at most.

Test:
	Test with 12 cpu X86 server and tip 3.10.0-rc1.

				base	smart

	| db_size | clients |  tps  | |  tps  |
	+---------+---------+-------+ +-------+
	| 21 MB   |       1 | 10749 | | 10337 |
	| 21 MB   |       2 | 21382 | | 21391 |
	| 21 MB   |       4 | 41570 | | 41808 |
	| 21 MB   |       8 | 52828 | | 58792 |
	| 21 MB   |      12 | 48447 | | 54553 |
	| 21 MB   |      16 | 46246 | | 56726 |	+22.66%
	| 21 MB   |      24 | 43850 | | 56853 |	+29.65%
	| 21 MB   |      32 | 43455 | | 55846 |	+28.51%
	| 7483 MB |       1 |  9290 | |  8848 |
	| 7483 MB |       2 | 19347 | | 19351 |
	| 7483 MB |       4 | 37135 | | 37511 |
	| 7483 MB |       8 | 47310 | | 50210 |
	| 7483 MB |      12 | 42721 | | 49396 |
	| 7483 MB |      16 | 41016 | | 51826 |	+26.36%
	| 7483 MB |      24 | 37540 | | 52579 |	+40.06%
	| 7483 MB |      32 | 36756 | | 51332 |	+39.66%
	| 15 GB   |       1 |  8758 | |  8670 |
	| 15 GB   |       2 | 19204 | | 19249 |
	| 15 GB   |       4 | 36997 | | 37199 |
	| 15 GB   |       8 | 46578 | | 50681 |
	| 15 GB   |      12 | 42141 | | 48671 |
	| 15 GB   |      16 | 40518 | | 51280 |	+26.56%
	| 15 GB   |      24 | 36788 | | 52329 |	+42.24%
	| 15 GB   |      32 | 36056 | | 50350 | +39.64%

CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>