@akshay-vishnoi can you remove this example? I searched the codebase, and I cannot find any evidence for this behaviour. I know you said you have verified this is how it behaves *currently*, but that doesn't mean this behaviour is intentional and supported. It might very well be that the behaviour is incidental and subject to change in the future (meaning you shouldn't be relying on this in your code).

If we write this into the public documentation, it means that we are declaring this feature as supported and we have to make sure it behave the same way (by adding relevant tests). (The documented behaviour for `limit` has several tests for it.)