Hello,

On 28/10/13 9:26 PM, slava77 wrote:

> I'm curious why there are only cone 0.3 iso values. Did you give up on R
> = 0.4?

The size of the cone which should be used is a long story.
For the PF-isolation, we have always stored only cone size even if an 
other cone size was evaluated. As a result, I decided to drop we were 
not using.

Cheers,
Florian