> Why change name to General_IO? We agreed it should be general_IO as it
makes it more ROS compatible.
Sorry, it was an accident. I thought I had changed it back to "general_IO".

> Why do we have that? Only one stacker type for the GeneralIO module no?
This is just in case the driver wants to know the stacker type number. I'll
put one of these in the header for each type of stacker.




On 4 July 2013 10:07, Ugo Cupcic <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In
> sr_ronex_external_protocol/include/sr_ronex_external_protocol/Ronex_Protocol_0x0000000C_GIO_00.h:
>
> >  #define PRODUCT_ID                                        0x0000000C
> >  #define MAXIMUM_NUM_STACKERS                                       1
> > +#define STACKER_TYPE                                               2            //!< range [1..13]
>
> Why do we have that? Only one stacker type for the GeneralIO module no?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/shadow-robot/sr-ronex/pull/13/files#r5027720>
> .
>