Unfortunately, no. Something was going wrong when it was named just
'Gemfile'. Was outputting like an ERb-ized Gemfile that looked internal to
Rails. Wasn't able to quickly hunt it down so tried a different name. Agree
"_clean" is weak. Other ideas on names or someone else want to a stab at
debugging when named 'Gemfile'?

On Thursday, January 17, 2013, Joe Ferris wrote:

> In templates/Gemfile_clean:
>
> > @@ -1,11 +1,21 @@
> > -gem 'thin'
>
> Can we just name this Gemfile? The "clean" doesn't add any information
> for me.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/thoughtbot/suspenders/pull/139/files#r2681561>.
>
>