btrfs: fix minor typo in comment

In the comment describing the sync_writers field of the btrfs_inode
struct, "fsyncing" was misspelled "fsycing."

Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: do not continue if out of memory happens

If out of memory happens, we should return -ENOMEM directly to the caller
rather than continue the work.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix confusing edquot happening case

Step to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/<mnt>/data bs=1M count=10
	sync
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup create 0/5 <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup limit 5M 0/5 <mnt>
	rm -f /<mnt>/data
	sync
	btrfs qgroup show <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=data bs=1M count=1

>From the perspective of users, qgroup's referenced or exclusive
is negative,but user can not continue to write data! a workaround
way is to cast u64 to s64 when doing qgroup reservation.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: remove unused argument of fixup_low_keys()

Argument 'trans' is not used in fixup_low_keys(). So, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: cleanup of function where fixup_low_keys() is called

If argument 'trans' is unnecessary in the function where
fixup_low_keys() is called, 'trans' is deleted.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: remove unused argument of btrfs_extend_item()

Argument 'trans' is not used in btrfs_extend_item().

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: cleanup of function where btrfs_extend_item() is called

Argument 'trans' became unnecessary from setup_inline_extent_backref()
that called btrfs_extend_item().

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix reada debug code compilation

This fixes the following errors:

  fs/btrfs/reada.c: In function ‘btrfs_reada_wait’:
  fs/btrfs/reada.c:958:42: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’)
  fs/btrfs/reada.c:961:41: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’)

Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: return error when we specify wrong start to defrag

We need such a sanity check for wrong start when we defrag a file, otherwise,
even with a wrong start that's larger than file size, we can end up changing
not only inode's force compress flag but also FS's incompat flags.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: remove unused variable in the iterate_extent_inodes()

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: don't force pages under writeback to finish when aborting

Dave reported a BUG_ON() that happened in end_page_writeback() after an abort.
This happened because we unconditionally call end_page_writeback() in the endio
case, which is right.  However when we abort the transaction we will call
end_page_writeback() on any writeback pages we find, which is wrong.  We need to
lock the page and wait on page writeback to complete if it is.  There is nothing
unsafe about this since we are discarding the transaction anyway.  Thanks,

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: clear received_uuid field for new writable snapshots

For created snapshots, the full root_item is copied from the source
root and afterwards selectively modified. The current code forgets
to clear the field received_uuid. The only problem is that it is
confusing when you look at it with 'btrfs subv list', since for
writable snapshots, the contents of the snapshot can be completely
unrelated to the previously received snapshot.
The receiver ignores such snapshots anyway because he also checks
the field stransid in the root_item and that value used to be reset
to zero for all created snapshots.

This commit changes two things:
- clear the received_uuid field for new writable snapshots.
- don't clear the send/receive related information like the stransid
  for read-only snapshots (which makes them useable as a parent for
  the automatic selection of parents in the receive code).

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix missing check about ulist_add() in qgroup.c

ulist_add() may return -ENOMEM, fix missing check about
return value.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: add all ioctl checks before user change for quota operations

Since all the quota configurations are loaded in memory, and we can
have ioctl checks before operating in the disk. It is safe to do such
things because qgroup_ioctl_lock is held outside.

Without these extra checks firstly, it should be ok to do user change
for quota operations. For example:

if we want to add an existed qgroup, we will do:
	->add_qgroup_item()
		->add_qgroup_rb()

add_qgroup_item() will return -EEXIST to us, however, qgroups are all
in memory, why not check them in memory firstly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix lockdep warning

The locking order for stuff is

__sb_start_write
ordered_mutex

but with sync() we don't do __sb_start_write for some strange reason, which
means that our iput in wait_ordered_extents could start a transaction which does
the __sb_start_write while we're holding the ordered_mutex.  Fix this by using
delayed iput in sync.  Thanks,

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix possible infinite loop in slow caching

So I noticed there is an infinite loop in the slow caching code.  If we return 1
when we hit the end of the tree, so we could end up caching the last block group
the slow way and suddenly we're looping forever because we just keep
re-searching and trying again.  Fix this by only doing btrfs_next_leaf() if we
don't need_resched().  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: use REQ_META for all metadata IO

We need to tag metadata io with REQ_META to avoid priority inversion when using
io throttling cqroups.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: deal with bad mappings in btrfs_map_block

Martin Steigerwald reported a BUG_ON() in btrfs_map_block where we didn't find
a chunk for a particular block we were trying to map.  This happened because the
block was bogus.  We shouldn't be BUG_ON()'ing in this case, just print a
message and return an error.  This came from reada_add_block and it appears to
deal with an error fine so we should be good there.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: don't call readahead hook until we have read the entire eb

Martin Steigerwald reported a BUG_ON() where we were given a bogus bytenr to
map.  Turns out he is using > PAGESIZE leafsizes.  The readahead stuff is called
every time we do a completion, but we may not have finished reading in all the
pages, so the bytenr we read off the node could be completely bogus.  Fix this
by only calling the readahead hook once all pages have been read in.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: don't BUG_ON() in btrfs_num_copies

A user sent me a btrfs-image that was panicing because of some corruption.  This
is because we pass in a bogus value to btrfs_num_copies, and it panics.  Instead
just return 1.  We only call btrfs_num_copies to see if there are other copies
to try and read for things, so if we just return 1 it will make the callers exit
out with an appropriate error value.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>