Propose MIT license, as well-known, standard, alternative.

Nice work there. :)
This PR is a proposal to you, to eventually use a well-known license which gives basically the same rights you offered, only it is commonly used and better known: MIT license, probably the most permissive license which is OSI approved as open source.

There is a difference though: MIT does require attribution (not link back, but still credit/attribution, per license requirement). Every Open Source license does (those who are approved by Open Source Initiative.). If you don't want it to, I can suggest also, a quite well known 'license' which is almost a public domain dedication, which doesn't require attribution:
http://unlicense.org/

Feel free to simply close the request if MIT isn't at all what you wish.