Would you propose to have just have ica.sources_as_epochs (which is
designed for epochs) as a counterpart to ica.sources_as_raw?


On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Alexandre Gramfort <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In mne/preprocessing/ica.py:
>
> > +            Comment that describes the Evoked data created.
> > +        picks : array-like
> > +            Channels to be included in addition to the sources. If None,
> > +            artifact and stimulus channels will be included.
> > +        verbose : bool, str, int, or None
> > +            If not None, override default verbose level (see mne.verbose).
> > +            Defaults to raw.verbose.
> > +
> > +        Returns
> > +        -------
> > +        ica_epochs : instance of Epochs
> > +            The epochs in ICA space.
> > +        """
> > +        pass
> > +
> > +    def sources_as_epochs_from_epochs(self, epochs, picks=None):
>
> to be consistent with sources_as_raw it should just be sources_as_epochs.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/pull/540/files#r3596633>
> .
>