Why do you think it's a bad idea to encourage the adoption of `RSpec.describe`?  I've been hoping that we could make RSpec 4.0 default to zero monkey patching, and encouraging the use of `RSpec.describe` is necessary to get there.

That said, it's brand new, so whereas the `expect` syntax has been there a while and we've gotten very positive feedback on it, the same can't be said for this.  So maybe it's something that we should wait to add until we get user feedback about it?  OTOH, I want folks to be aware that they can run RSpec w/o monkey patching, and having this here helps raise awareness.