I'm not sure if we really want to translate the contenttypes. 'page' and 'entries' are provided by the default `contenttypes.yml`, but they shouldn't be treated any other way than any that we might add ourselves. Also, if we start down this path, we'll open a huge can of worms, because dutch has male/female like french. German adds neutral, Russian has nominative/dative, and Polish does something completely else. There's no way we can even begin to get this right with the contenttypes people will add themselves. 

I think we should translate contenttypes in other languages in URL's, but not in strings and labels in the background. i.e.: `http://example.org/article/bonjour-monde` and `http://example.org/entry/hello-world` is fine, but use one (gender neutral) form for labels: `Cette 'kitchensink' ne peut être enregistrée`. It might not be ideal, but at least it'll be realistically doable.