How exactly did it break the tests? That seems important - if it only works
for this format of the data, it's not really generally useful, right?


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:14 PM, MrBago <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In dipy/data/__init__.py:
>
> > @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ def get_data(name='small_64D'):
> >          return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'dsi515_b_table.txt')
> >      if name == 'grad514':
> >          return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'grad_514.txt')
> > +    if name == "small_25":
>
> I tried to use each of those, but somehow I couldn't get my test to work
> without breaking other tests. In the end the best solution I found was
> adding another data set. There is probably a better long term solution, but
> I didn't want to make this pull request contingent on fixing those issues.
> Bago On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Ariel Rokem <notifications@github.com
> >wrote:
> … <#13dc8bd5fa9d5382_>
>  In dipy/data/__init__.py: > @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ def
> get_data(name='small_64D'): > return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'dsi515_b_table.txt')
> > if name == 'grad514': > return pjoin(THIS_DIR, 'grad_514.txt') > + if
> name == "small_25": Do you really need this new data set? Can't you use the
> small 64D set, or the small 101D set? — Reply to this email directly or
> view it on GitHub<https://github.com/nipy/dipy/pull/163/files#r3611928> .
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/nipy/dipy/pull/163/files#r3612084>
> .
>