Why avoid 1.0? I'm switching to semver. Meaning these are breaking changes.
Apache 2 basically means that people adding patches include rights to any
of their patents attached to additions.

And yeah, I'm not sure about the maintainer. I'm basically the maintainer,
since if people have problems it would be way faster for them to come to me
rather than email ops@mc and hope the alias gets to someone. I guess I'm
just raising the question of who should be the maintainer.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 23, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Dan Buch <notifications@github.com> wrote:

In metadata.rb:

> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
> -maintainer       "ModCloth, Inc."
> -maintainer_email "ops@modcloth.com"
> -license          "Apache 2.0"
> -description      "Allows delegation of service management to users with Solaris Role Based Access Control (RBAC)"
> -long_description IO.read(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'README.rdoc'))
> -version          "0.0.3"
> +name             'rbac'
> +maintainer       'ModCloth, Inc.'
> +maintainer_email 'sax@livinginthepast.org'
> +license          'Apache 2.0'
> +description      'Allows delegation of service management to users with Solaris Role Based Access Control (RBAC)'
> +long_description IO.read(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'README.md'))
> +version          '1.0.1'

Again here with version + license combo. Switch to MIT or avoid version 1
forever. Also, maintainer is ModCloth, Inc, reachable at
sax@livinginthepast.org? [image: :smile_cat:]

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHub<https://github.com/modcloth-cookbooks/rbac/pull/2/files#r4374995>
.