Yes to both questions: I think "latest versions only" is the mode currently
employed by most organizations, and I think we'll see that it will be used
even in the presence of more sofisticated workflows. I'm not sure where the
value of Candlepin is for the majority of users when used together with
custom products -- how many of them care about controlling usage of
publicly available software? It's possible I'm missing something.
On Jul 19, 2013 7:01 PM, "Ohad Levy" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In amqp_adaptors/pulp_commands/repository_commands.rb:
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> > +module PulpCommands
> > +  class Repositories
> > +    def create(attrs)
> > +      # assume library for the time being,
> > +      #if we are in library, no need for an distributor, but need to sync
>
> do you see a usage case where we just have plain repos? e.g. without
> forcing the library lifecycle ? and only pulp without CP?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_content/pull/4/files#r5298744>
> .
>