cpuidle: remove the power_specified field in the driver

We realized that the power usage field is never filled and when it
is filled for tegra, the power_specified flag is not set causing all
of these values to be reset when the driver is initialized with
set_power_state().

However, the power_specified flag can be simply removed under the
assumption that the states are always backward sorted, which is the
case with the current code.

This change allows the menu governor select function and the
cpuidle_play_dead() to be simplified.  Moreover, the
set_power_states() function can removed as it does not make sense
any more.

Drop the power_specified flag from struct cpuidle_driver and make
the related changes as described above.

As a consequence, this also fixes the bug where on the dynamic
C-states system, the power fields are not initialized.

[rjw: Changelog]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42870
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43349
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Merge branch 'fixes-next' into bleeding-edge

* fixes-next:
  cpuidle: remove the power_specified field in the driver
cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()

__cpufreq_remove_dev() is called on multiple occasions: cpufreq_driver
unregister and cpu removals.

Current implementation of this routine is overly complex without much need. If
the cpu to be removed is the policy->cpu, we remove the policy first and add all
other cpus again from policy->cpus and then finally call __cpufreq_remove_dev()
again to remove the cpu to be deleted. Haahhhh..

There exist a simple solution to removal of a cpu:
- Simply use the old policy structure
- update its fields like: policy->cpu, etc.
- notify any users of cpufreq, which depend on changing policy->cpu

Hence this patch, which tries to implement the above theory. It is tested well
by myself on ARM big.LITTLE TC2 SoC, which has 5 cores (2 A15 and 3 A7). Both
A15's share same struct policy and all A7's share same policy structure.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

Currently cpufreq_add_dev() firsts allocates policy, calls driver->init() and
then checks if this cpu is already managed or not. And if it is already managed,
free its policy.

We can save all this if we somehow know cpu is managed or not in advance.
policy->related_cpus contains list of all valid sibling cpus of policy->cpu. We
can check this to know if current cpu is already managed.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-next' into bleeding-edge

* pm-cpufreq-next:
  cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
  cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()