Hey,

No actually this method is more robust as any kind of format would be
working as this will only match checksum.

If this had been the initial method, we wouldn't have had to patch this.
By respect of the initial code, I didn't replace everything including
the split, but we can.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Philippe.

On 8/28/13 2:05 PM, David wrote:
> In blockfinder:
> 
>>                  continue
>> +            else:
>> +                regex = re.compile("[a-f0-9]{32}")
> 
> There is no need to use regex here, just do a .split() and take first
> item in the list as the checksum.
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/ioerror/blockfinder/pull/64/files#r6031340>.
>