I think that name is fine, but I'm all ears for suggestions.  What don't
you like about it?

You realize getPath1 and getPath2 are included only because of the desire
to be backward compatible for some pretty strange edge-cases.  If it was my
decision, I would remove getPath1 (the original getPath).





On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Veena Basavaraj
<notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In lib/dust.js:
>
> > @@ -155,20 +165,59 @@ Context.prototype.get = function(key) {
> >    return this.global ? this.global[key] : undefined;
> >  };
> >
> > -Context.prototype.getPath = function(cur, down) {
> > +//no dot path resolution, function eval, or searching globals
> > +Context.prototype.getPath1 = function(cur, down) {
>
> getPath1? I am think hard on the names, it is not easy, but it should not
> be getPath1 !
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/linkedin/dustjs/pull/271/files#r4741201>
> .
>