A couple interesting results...

![screen shot 2013-05-19 at 7 49 57 pm](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/965948/523327/dad36be4-c0ac-11e2-84a4-c7a014b0e134.png)
An identical sequence matches perfectly

![screen shot 2013-05-19 at 7 49 09 pm](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/965948/523331/004193f6-c0ad-11e2-853f-a56a5872aa17.png)
Translating it by PI and anchoring the beginning and end

![screen shot 2013-05-19 at 7 48 46 pm](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/965948/523332/1c51bb5c-c0ad-11e2-9597-1fe3fcc28d31.png)
Adding an additional PI points to the top sequence and allowing a 2 PI anchor slack in the beginning

![screen shot 2013-05-19 at 7 50 38 pm](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/965948/523339/6f37df72-c0ad-11e2-8f26-4aeab1ec0b30.png)
Increasing the amplitude on one sequence doesn't result in a 'perfect' match...

Maybe you can give me your thoughts (especially the last result)? I think it is intuitively correct - the algorithm will try to avoid mapping very high/deep peaks/troughs?