DOES method
actually Role->DOES probably shouldn't work; tests for Class->does too
allow "with" to take a single string
Merge pull request #7 from tobyink/with-string

Allow "with" to take a single string
Merge pull request #6 from tobyink/DOES-method

DOES method
I ... love ... my ... elipsis ...
quick implementation of Option's ala-Scala
Merge branch 'master' into roles-take-one
more tests and stuff on the example
add tests to check the bootstrap goals
remove the isa relationship between mop::role and mop::object, we don't actually need it
example of what the MOP should look like written in itself, and some bootstrap goals laid out
another bit of docs
no need to bootstrap twice
method and attribute conflicts
some notes and docs
build a composite first
add some conflict tests in there for this
better name for the value
improving on the name of hte composite role