These two methods are invoked in 3 source files
("UnderFileSystemSingleLocal.java" , "BlockOutStream.java" and
"TachyonFs.java").
Maybe we do not have to relocate the two methods into the
"UnderFileSystemSingleLocal.java".

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Haoyuan Li <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In src/main/java/tachyon/CommonUtils.java:
>
> > @@ -283,4 +292,42 @@ public static InetSocketAddress parseInetSocketAddress(String address) throws IO
> >      }
> >      return new InetSocketAddress(strArr[0], Integer.parseInt(strArr[1]));
> >    }
> > +
> > +  /**
> > +   * @param file that will be changed to full permission
> > +   */
> > +  public static void changeToFullPermission(String file) {
> > +    //set the full permission to everyone.
>
> Seems "changeToFullPermission" and "setStickyBit" only work for
> localfilefs, is there any reason to not put them in
> "UnderFileSystemSingleLocal.java"?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/amplab/tachyon/pull/65/files#r7779140>
> .
>