sync: signal pt before sync_timeline object gets destroyed

There is a race condition

Assume we have *one* sync_fence object, with *one* sync_pt
which belongs to *one* sync_timeline, given this condition,
sync_timeline->kref will have two counts, one for sync_timeline
(implicit) and another for sync_pt.

Assume following is the situation on CPU

Theead-1 : (Thread which calls sync_timeline_destroy())
  -> (some function calls)
   -> sync_timeline_destory()
    -> sync_timeline_signal() (CPU is inside this
function after putting reference to sync_timeline)

At this time Thread-2 comes and does following

Thread-2 : (fclose on fence fd)
> sync_fence_release() -> because of fclose() on fence object
 -> sync_fence_free()
  -> sync_pt_free()
   -> kref_put(&pt->parent->kref, sync_timeline_free);
    -> sync_timeline_free() (CPU is inside this because
this time kref will be zero after _put)

Thread-2 will free sync_timeline object before Thread-1
has finished its work inside sync_timeline_signal.

With this change we signals all sync_pt before putting
reference to sync_timeline object.

Change-Id: Ic680e4d0bbef1c46bcb7cfba693395645241d203
Signed-off-by: Prakash Kamliya <pkamliya@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Remove unnecessary cpu_online() check

Cpufreq no longer calls governor callback for offlined cpus. i.e. All
policy->cpus are guaranteed to be online. Hence we don't need explicit check to
see if cpu is online or not.

Change-Id: I9ad85ea4addd5b4a40952e59ed730dd15e328690
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Move definition of cpufreq_gov_interactive downwards

This moves definition of cpufreq_gov_interactive towards the bottom of file, so
that we don't have to add prototype of cpufreq_governor_interactive() in the
beginning of file.

Change-Id: I04bd1004954eb36502c5cd7e35d3d7274cddaf95
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
cpufreq: Interactive: Implement per policy instances of governor

If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct
policy (per package), currently we can't have multiple instances of same
governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances of Interactive governor for
multiple packages.

This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages
to use Interactive governor, but with different tunables.

This patch uses the infrastructure provided by earlier patches pushed in
Mainline in v3.10-rc1/rc2 and implements per policy instances of Interactive
governor.

Change-Id: I70436d4a5a45c6cb6edf37f3e46d0b9fbc930982
[toddpoynor@google.com: merge with later code, minor changes]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>