I'm pretty sure I put an incident in to annotate the sample_config.js as
well, can we add that into 22312, and make it a priority that any changes
in sample_config.js attempt to annotate everything

Dave Cramer
Senior Enterprise Architect
+1-757-461-3022x130
davec@xtuple.com
xTuple.com <http://www.xtuple.org/>  <http://www.xTuple.org>– Download FREE
PostBooks ERP, CRM, accounting software
xTuple.org <http://www.xtuple.org/> – Contribute to World’s #1 open source
ERP community
NextBusinessBlog.com <http://www.nextbusinessblog.com/> – Join the global
innovation conversation


On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, shackbarth <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In scripts/install_bi.sh:
>
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >  #!/bin/sh
> >  RUN_DIR=$(pwd)
> > -LOG_FILE=$RUN_DIR/install_bi.log
> > +LOG_FILE=$RUN_DIR/instalLOG_FLl_bi.log
>
> I'm just now seeing how ugly our sample_config looks, with some paths
> specifying dev-like locations and other paths specifying production-like
> locations. Both should be make generic, and the scripts can set them
> correctly. I've added an incident for this: 22312. Not a super-high
> priority, as it's mostly cosmetic.
>
> Regardless, we should update the scripts as part of this incident.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/xtuple/xtuple/pull/1159/files#r8556149>
> .
>