I'm hewing to the libuv conventions, rather than C (although I don't think that's horrible, either). It's familiar to some; not so to others. Yes, I know we want to expose other mappings and we don't want to couple, idealogically, to libuv too much. I just reached for what was convenient, and the naming is in keeping with existing, rust API that hews towards low-level API naming conventions and all-around brevity.

Can we punt this decision to a future PR? Thank you.