How about using s.c.F and the Akka Java HOFs for Foreach, Mapper, Filter
etc?

= less maintenance
= easier transition from Java to Scala
= lower overhead for using Java
On May 19, 2013 1:21 PM, "Rich Dougherty" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In
> documentation/manual/javaGuide/main/akka/code/javaguide/akka/ask/Application.java:
>
> > @@ -12,7 +13,7 @@
> >      public static Result index() {
> >          ActorRef myActor = Akka.system().actorFor("user/my-actor");
> >          return async(
> > -            Akka.asPromise(ask(myActor, "hello", 1000)).map(
> > +            Promise.wrap(ask(myActor, "hello", 1000)).map(
>
> Maybe we can talk about using the F prefix when we know that an unprefixed
> name would start to bite users, i.e if/when make the name change you're
> talking about? :)
>
> In the meantime, I'd prefer just to leave it the same for now, to make it
> slightly easier for users by not changing things without an immediate
> benefit to them. It's easy to update the manual later. I'm not against
> making the change at all. I just think let's wait until we know what we're
> doing and then make a plan for how we recommend using the API. Does that
> sound OK?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/playframework/Play20/pull/1102/files#r4289802>
> .
>