In Debian both libarpack (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libarpack2) and
arpack (http://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy/math/arpack) does exist. I
do not have a strong feeling on either choice.


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Derek Ashley Thomas <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In libarpack.rb:
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +require 'formula'
> > +
> > +class Libarpack < Formula
>
> Yes, the official rules for contributors states:
>
> Choose a name that’s the colloquial (most common) name for the project.
> For example, we chose objective-caml, but we should have chosen ocaml.
> Choose what people say to each other when talking about the project.
>
> So, what do you think as a user of libarpack / arpack?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-science/pull/188/files#r4377275>
> .
>