sched: Cleanup pre_schedule_rt

Since [commit 9a897c5a:
sched: RT-balance, replace hooks with pre/post schedule and wakeup methods]
we must call pre_schedule_rt if prev is rt task.
So condition rt_task(prev) is always true and the 'unlikely' declaration is
simply incorrect.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
sched: Change pick_next_task_rt from unlikely to likely

The if (unlikely(!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)) test in pick_next_task_rt()
tests if there is another rt task ready to run. If so, then pick it.

In most systems, only one RT task runs at a time most of the time.
Running the branch unlikely annotator profiler on a system doing average
work "running firefox, evolution, xchat, distcc builds, etc", it showed the
following:

 correct incorrect  %        Function                  File              Line
 ------- ---------  -        --------                  ----              ----
  324344 135104992  99 _pick_next_task_rt             sched_rt.c           1064

99% of the time the condition is true. When an RT task schedules out,
it is unlikely that another RT task is waiting to run on that same run queue.

Simply remove the unlikely() condition.

Acked-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc:Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
sched: Remove unlikely() from rt_policy() in sched.c

The rt_policy() has an unlikely() that the policy it is checking is
of RT priority (SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR).

According to the annotate branch profiler it is incorrect most of the time:

 correct incorrect  %        Function                  File              Line
 ------- ---------  -        --------                  ----              ----
   36667   654674  94 rt_policy                      sched.c              126

This makes sense because the rt_policy() is used by the sched_set_scheduler()
and nice(). Although users may use sys_nice a bit, all RT users use
the sched_set_scheduler() to set their RT priority, including kernel
threads.

The above numbers were from a normal desktop computer running
firefox, evolution, xchat and was part of a distcc compile farm.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
sched: Remove unlikely() from ttwu_post_activation

The unlikely() used in ttwu_post_activation() tests if the rq->idle_stamp
is set. But since this is for a wakeup, and wakeups happen when tasks
block on IO, and blocking tasks on IO may put the system into idle,
this can actually be a common occurence.

Running the annotated branch profiler on an average desktop running
firefox, evolution, xchat and distcc, the report shows:

 correct incorrect  %        Function             File              Line
 ------- ---------  -        --------             ----              ----
34884862 146110926  80 ttwu_post_activation      sched.c            2309

80% of the time, this unlikely is incorrect. Best not to assume what the
result is, and just remove the branch annotation.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
netfilter: xt_CT: provide info on why a rule was rejected

Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
kconfig: autogenerated config_is_xxx macro

this will allow to use to use

	if(config_is_xxx())
	if(config_is_xxx_module())

in the code instead of

	#ifdef CONFIG_xxx
	#ifdef CONFIG_xxx_MODULE

and now let the compiler remove the non usefull code and not the
pre-processor

as done in the mach-types for arm as exmaple

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
ftrace/kbuild: Add recordmcount files to force full build

Modifications to recordmcount must be performed on all object
files to stay consistent with what the kernel code may expect.
Add the recordmcount files to the main dependencies to make sure
any change to them causes a full recompile.

Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110517133646.GP13293@sepie.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
ftrace/trivial: Clean up recordmcount.c to use Linux style comparisons

The Linux ftrace subsystem style for comparing is:

  var == 1
  var > 0

and not:

  1 == var
  0 < var

It is considered that Linux developers are smart enough not to do the

  if (var = 1)

mistake.

Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023737.290712238@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.c
	scripts/recordmcount.h
ftrace/trivial: Clean up record mcount to use Linux switch style

The Linux style for switch statements is:

	switch (var) {
	case x:
		[...]
		break;
	}

Not:
	switch (var) {
	case x: {
		[...]
	} break;

Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023737.523968644@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.c
ftrace: Add .kprobe.text section to whitelist for recordmcount.c

The .kprobe.text section is safe to modify mcount to nop and tracing.
Add it to the whitelist in recordmcount.c and recordmcount.pl.

Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023737.743350547@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.c
ftrace/recordmcount: Modify only executable sections

PROGBITS is not enough to determine if the section should be modified
or not. Only process sections that are marked as executable.

Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023737.991485123@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.h
ftrace/recordmcount: Make ignored mcount calls into nops at compile time

There are sections that are ignored by ftrace for the function tracing because
the text is in a section that can be removed without notice. The mcount calls
in these sections are ignored and ftrace never sees them. The downside of this
is that the functions in these sections still call mcount. Although the mcount
function is defined in assembly simply as a return, this added overhead is
unnecessary.

The solution is to convert these callers into nops at compile time.
A better solution is to add 'notrace' to the section markers, but as new sections
come up all the time, it would be nice that they are delt with when they
are created.

Later patches will deal with finding these sections and doing the proper solution.

Thanks to H. Peter Anvin for giving me the right nops to use for x86.

Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023738.237101176@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.c
	scripts/recordmcount.h
ftrace/recordmcount: Add warning logic to warn on mcount not recorded

There's some sections that should not have mcount recorded and should not have
modifications to the that code. But currently they waste some time by calling
mcount anyway (which simply returns). As the real answer should be to
either whitelist the section or have gcc ignore it fully.

This change adds a option to recordmcount to warn when it finds a section
that is ignored by ftrace but still contains mcount callers. This is not on
by default as developers may not know if the section should be completely
ignored or added to the whitelist.

Cc: John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421023738.476989377@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
	scripts/recordmcount.c
	scripts/recordmcount.h