Yes,  of course it was. My point was rather that this statement appears to make general implications (the correction would be small). The same reasoning would apply to any external reference channel and is not KIT specific, therefore not a good candidate for giving reasons. It's just no implemented right now and given that it won't make a huge difference nobody cared so far. But it does not mean that the KIT ref channels are extra far aways from the neural sources. I would therefor just drop that last comment.