Do you think we would ever want to use the ipc transport?  What would the
usage case be?


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Min RK <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In IPython/frontend/html/notebook/kernelmanager.py:
>
> >
> > -    def get_kernel_ip(self, kernel_id):
> > -        """Return ip address for a kernel.
> > +    def create_connected_stream(self, ip, port, socket_type):
> > +        sock = self.context.socket(socket_type)
> > +        addr = "tcp://%s:%i" % (ip, port)
> > +        self.log.info("Connecting to: %s" % addr)
> > +        sock.connect(addr)
> > +        return ZMQStream(sock)
>
> you might allow transport as a switch (default tcp, of course) - The base
> KM supports IPC now.
>
> There's a nomenclature issue with ip/port with tcp and path for ipc,
> but we support 'ipc://%s-%s' % (ip, port) for ipc.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/2775/files#r2643574>.
>
>



-- 
Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com