Implement soft pressure on UMA cache bucket sizes.

Every time system detects low memory condition decrease bucket sizes for
each zone by one item.  As result, higher memory pressure will push to
smaller bucket sizes and so smaller per-CPU caches and so more efficient
memory use.

Before this change there was no force to oppose buckets growth as result
of practically inevitable zone lock conflicts, and after some run time
per-CPU caches could consume enough RAM to kill the system.
Add two new UMA bucket zones to store 3 and 9 items per bucket.

These new buckets make bucket size self-tuning more soft and precise.
Without them there are buckets for 1, 5, 13, 29, ... items.  While at
bigger sizes difference about 2x is fine, at smallest ones it is 5x and
2.6x respectively.  New buckets make that line look like 1, 3, 5, 9, 13,
29, reducing jumps between steps, making algorithm work softer, allocating
and freeing memory in better fitting chunks.  Otherwise there is quite a
big gap between allocating 128K and 5x128K of RAM at once.
Grow UMA zone bucket size also on lock congestion during item free.

Lock congestion is the same, whether it happens on alloc or free, so
handle it equally.  Now that we have back pressure, there is no problem
to grow buckets a bit faster.  Any way growth is much slower then in 9.x.